Why Shorter Sprints Give You a Competitive Edge
Best Practices, Scrum Workflow Jim Schiel Best Practices, Scrum Workflow Jim Schiel

Why Shorter Sprints Give You a Competitive Edge

Shorter Sprints aren’t just a trend—they’re a strategic advantage. While Scrum allows Sprint lengths up to one calendar month, more and more teams are choosing to run 1- or 2-week Sprints. This post explores why shorter cycles reduce complexity, increase adaptability, and result in higher-performing teams—and how to experiment with Sprint length to find your team’s sweet spot.

Read More
Sprint in Trouble? Here’s What Great Scrum Teams Do Next

Sprint in Trouble? Here’s What Great Scrum Teams Do Next

In Scrum, it’s not enough to deliver high-quality work. Teams must also take ownership of how the work is done and how they respond when things don’t go as planned. This post outlines five actions Scrum teams can take when they realize the Sprint Goal is at risk—and how to develop the habit of self-correction before it’s too late.

Read More
The Hidden Cost of Big Backlog Items

The Hidden Cost of Big Backlog Items

In creative work like software development, bigger always means riskier. Large backlog items increase complexity, delay feedback, and compromise quality. This post breaks down why “smaller is smarter” in Scrum and how decomposing large Product Backlog Items (PBIs) can dramatically improve your team’s flow, confidence, and results.

Read More
Why You Should Think Twice Before Changing Sprint Content

Why You Should Think Twice Before Changing Sprint Content

High-performing Scrum teams thrive on focus, commitment, and trust. Yet one of the fastest ways to erode that performance is to repeatedly change the Sprint after it’s begun. While Scrum allows flexibility, it’s not a license for chaos. In this article, we explore why scope changes during a Sprint are so damaging—and what leaders can do instead to protect team focus and boost long-term performance.

Read More